Problem statement
Hosts with nested listings are charged full price for all properties in the nest, even when one or more child listings are blocked or unavailable for extended periods (e.g., several months). This creates a billing mismatch: the host is paying for active management of properties that aren't generating bookings or requiring day-to-day oversight.
Current workaround
The only option to reduce billing is to mute the unavailable property entirely. However, muting disconnects the property from Hospitable's services, which means:
This forces hosts to choose between paying full price for inactive properties or losing the ability to accept future bookings.
Impact
Proposed solution
Introduce a reduced billing tier or discounted rate for nested child listings that are marked as unavailable or blocked for a defined period (e.g., 30+ days). The property would remain connected to Hospitable for syncing and far-out bookings, but the host would pay a lower rate that reflects the reduced management activity.
Unlock
Hosts would be able to maintain their nested listing structure and accept far-out bookings on the parent listing, while only paying for the level of service they're actually using. This would make Hospitable more cost-effective for hosts with seasonal or temporarily inactive properties, and reduce churn for hosts considering alternative solutions.
Please authenticate to join the conversation.
New
π‘ Feature requests
1 day ago
Get notified by email when there are changes.
New
π‘ Feature requests
1 day ago
Get notified by email when there are changes.